

On January 4, 2022, Hotbit spotted some abnormal deposits of POKT token and immediately disabled POKT trading/ deposit& withdrawal (announcement link) before communicating with the POKT team in no time.
Hotbit has conducted a thorough investigation and reviewed the entire process, and present the detailed documentation (link to technical analysis). Brief conclusion is as follows:
In order to protect rightful interest of Hotbit users, Hotbit has made great efforts to reach out for making up the 2,461,317 POKT deficit. The information obtained during the whole process is as follows:
Based on the above as well as POKT team’s partial responsibility for the incident, Hotbit proposed to the POKT team that Hotbit could purchase of tokens at the price of private round to compensate users.
Unfortunately, Micheal, the founder of POKT, has been avoided conversations and refused to respond from Jan 6th till 13th this entire time despite the fact that Alex, the technical director of POKT, has admitted that he saw spam deposits on January 6. On January 13, another alleged POKT member, Adam, made a proposition to Hotbit that we could go to POKT DAO and initiate a motion to try treasury compensation.
And here is what we think:
DAO is a great governance tool yet it shouldn’t be a convenient tool to let the wrongful conduct off the hook. POKT team is responsible for the incident because of the wrong document. If we are lucky, the DAO motion gets passed so Hotbit users would recover from the loss; oh wait, but if the DAO motion should get denied, does that mean POKT team would be exempted and call it “the will of the community”?
The answer is obvious. And we believe POKT team should be held responsible for false documentation no matter what the DAO motion votes or what-they-may-call-it” will of the community”. Secondly, none of the investors have issued coins, meanwhile POKT team have been selling a large number of staking rewards of POKTs in the market, indicating that voting control is likely in their hands. POKT team has shown refusal to take responsibility, can we count on them to vote yes even if the DAO motion is initiated?
After Hotbit expressed this to POKT team, Adam actually began to slander Hotbit for selling counterfeit coins, completely ignoring the fact that Alex, a core member of his technical team, admitted many fake deposits tx (fake tx document link)
Based on the above, Hotbit strongly condemns the dereliction of duty of POKT team founder Micheal, and team member Adam’s refusal to cooperate and slander!
Hotbit will make every effort to protect users’ rights. We recommend that you take the following steps:
Related Links: